Systematic review and meta-analysis of linear and undulating periodized resistance training programs on muscular strength

Periodization is known to improve training adaptations but the most effective periodization approach for muscular strength development for a wide variety of populations is yet to be determined. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined all studies directly comparing linear and undulating periodized resistance training programs to determine and compare their effects on muscular strength. A systematic search of the MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and SPORTDiscus databases revealed 17 studies satisfying the inclusion criteria. There were a total of 510 participants in the included studies. Sixteen studies reported significant increases in strength for both periodization approaches. Five studies reported significant differences in improvements between groups. The meta-analyses determined that there were no differences in the effectiveness of linear vs. undulating periodization on upper-body or lower-body strength. The short-term nature of studies and the previous training history of participants were identified as potential confounding factors in the interpretation of findings. The results suggest that novelty or training variety are important for stimulating further strength development. Few studies have examined the effect of periodization approaches in adolescent or athletic populations.

Similar articles

Moesgaard L, Beck MM, Christiansen L, Aagaard P, Lundbye-Jensen J. Moesgaard L, et al. Sports Med. 2022 Jul;52(7):1647-1666. doi: 10.1007/s40279-021-01636-1. Epub 2022 Jan 19. Sports Med. 2022. PMID: 35044672

Williams TD, Tolusso DV, Fedewa MV, Esco MR. Williams TD, et al. Sports Med. 2017 Oct;47(10):2083-2100. doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0734-y. Sports Med. 2017. PMID: 28497285 Review.

Hartmann H, Wirth K, Keiner M, Mickel C, Sander A, Szilvas E. Hartmann H, et al. Sports Med. 2015 Oct;45(10):1373-86. doi: 10.1007/s40279-015-0355-2. Sports Med. 2015. PMID: 26133514 Review.

De Souza EO, Tricoli V, Rauch J, Alvarez MR, Laurentino G, Aihara AY, Cardoso FN, Roschel H, Ugrinowitsch C. De Souza EO, et al. J Strength Cond Res. 2018 May;32(5):1238-1244. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002482. J Strength Cond Res. 2018. PMID: 29683914 Clinical Trial.

Evans JW. Evans JW. Front Physiol. 2019 Jan 23;10:13. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00013. eCollection 2019. Front Physiol. 2019. PMID: 30728780 Free PMC article. Review.

Cited by

Lin TY, Chueh TY, Hung TM. Lin TY, et al. Sports Med Open. 2023 Dec 1;9(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s40798-023-00640-1. Sports Med Open. 2023. PMID: 38040927 Free PMC article.

Machado EM, Secchi LLB, Camargo PR, Mendonça LM. Machado EM, et al. Glob Health J. 2023 Mar;7(1):49-54. doi: 10.1016/j.glohj.2023.01.001. Epub 2023 Jan 11. Glob Health J. 2023. PMID: 36643776 Free PMC article.

Fossmo JE, van den Tillaar R. Fossmo JE, et al. Sports (Basel). 2022 Sep 27;10(10):148. doi: 10.3390/sports10100148. Sports (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36287761 Free PMC article. Review.

Bonilla DA, Cardozo LA, Vélez-Gutiérrez JM, Arévalo-Rodríguez A, Vargas-Molina S, Stout JR, Kreider RB, Petro JL. Bonilla DA, et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 5;19(19):12710. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912710. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36232010 Free PMC article. Review.

Kadlec D, Sainani KL, Nimphius S. Kadlec D, et al. Sports Med. 2023 Feb;53(2):313-325. doi: 10.1007/s40279-022-01766-0. Epub 2022 Oct 8. Sports Med. 2023. PMID: 36208412 Free PMC article. Review.